Fuel Economy Test Board - Engineering Explained

RankYearMakeModelDriveWt(lb)CdCREngine L*HPTranAsprRatingMPGL/100Km
12015VWJetta TDIFWD32410.316.22I4D1506MTTC31/4655.54.24
22015NissanJukeFWD30260.3510.51.6I4G188CVTTC28/3244.95.24
32014FordFusion EnergiFWD39130.2812.32I4GH195CVTNA41/4444.45.30
42015SubaruXV CrosstrekAWD318610.52H4G148CVTNA26/3441.75.64
52015VWGTIFWD29720.319.62I4G2106MTTC25/3441.35.70
62015SubaruImpreza SportAWD31360.3210.52H4G148CVTNA27/3641.15.72
72014ToyotaCorollaFWD28650.28101.8I4G132CVTNA29/3740.85.77
82015ScionFRSRWD28060.2712.52H4G2006ATNA25/3440.65.79
92015SubaruBRZ (S.B)RWD27740.2712.52H4G2006MTNA22/3038.16.17
102015ChevyTraxFWD31869.51.4I4G1386ATTC26/3438.16.17
112015Chrysler200FWD34730.27102.4I4G1849ATNA23/3637.66.26
122015VWBeetle R-LineFWD32380.379.62I4G2106MTTC23/3137.36.31
132016NissanMaximaFWD35930.2910.63.5V6G300CVTNA22/3035.96.55
142015SubaruWRXAWD32670.3210.62H4G2686MTTC21/2835.16.70
152015SubaruOutbackAWD363310.32.5H4G175CVTNA25/3334.86.76
162015NissanRogueAWD35450.33102.5I4G170CVTNA25/3233.67.00
172015FordMustangRWD36619.52.3I4G3106ATNA20/3033.57.02
182014FordEscapeFWD3515101.6I4G1786ATTC23/3233.57.02
192015.5VolvoS60 Drive-EFWD34720.2810.32I4G3028ATT+SC24/3533.27.08
202015KiaForte Koup SXFWD29821.6I4G2016ATTC22/3033.17.11
212015ToyotaCamryFWD34800.2810.83.5V6G2686ATNA21/3132.87.17
222015SubaruLegacyAWD366210.53.6H6G256CVTNA20/2932.37.28
232015Chrysler300AWD40290.3210.23.6V6G2928ATNA19/3130.87.64
242015NissanMuranoAWD39350.3110.33.5V6G260CVTNA21/2829.38.03
252015LexusIS250AWD36490.29122.5V6G2046ATNA20/2729.18.08
262015ChevyCorvetteRWD336211.56.2V8G4608ATNA16/2928.38.31
272014AudiS4AWD39350.310.33V6G3337DCSC18/2827.38.62
282014SubaruSTIAWD33730.358.22.5H4G3056MTTC17/2326.48.91
292015.5VolvoXC60AWD42770.359.33I6G3006ATTC17/2425.99.08
302014LexusGS 350AWD39700.2711.53.5V6G3066ATNA19/2625.99.08
312015LexusRC 350RWD37480.2911.83.5V6G3068ATNA19/2825.99.08
322015MitsuEVO MRAWD357192I4G2916DCTC17/2225.29.33
332015CadillacEscalade4WD584011.56.2V8G4208ATNA15/2121.111.15
342015ToyotaTundra TRD4WD56250.3810.25.7V8G3816ATNA13/1716.114.61

This testing includes a set course for the cars to run. The majority is highway with some city driving mixed in. The car is driven in a non-aggressive, lightly accelerating/decelerating manner. The course is roughly 53 miles, and the fuel economy rating is from the car's onboard fuel economy readout.

*Key: (Displacement/Layout/Fuel Type) D = Diesel, G = Gas, GH = Gas Hybrid

 

9 comments:

  1. A nice add to this chart would be official city/hwy MPG ratings. Great job, I love your videos.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Does this mean there might be a brz review in the works?

    ReplyDelete
  3. As if it weren't abundant that the replica watches uk had a starring role in a admired activity film, it's aswell in abundant appearance for a alarm that's about 50 years old. Leaving all that aside, it's unique: Eon Productions, the aggregation abaft all the Bond films, ordered it from the breitling replica jeweler Bucherer, but requested a red additional duke instead of one in stainless steel. This affection sets it afar from added rolex replica that allotment its reference, 6238.

    ReplyDelete
  4. If the mpg reading came from the onboard manufacturer readout, them can we trust VW's?

    ReplyDelete
  5. I have a TDI that I'm selling back and the on-board readout is within .2mpg of my own calculations. Very reliable considering. I haven't done testing with the emissions forced on, but not too concerned about that now.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Are the onboard fuel economy readouts ever correct?? In my experience they are always at least 1 ltr/100km wrong. Would be nice to see real consumption too, just by fueling to max before and after the trip, and seeing how much was used for a given range.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Economy" is by all accounts an exceptionally basic word in numerous vocabularies.Investment websites

    ReplyDelete